Separated by uncommon language

Techies.  Propeller heads.  Geeks.  Nerds.  The great unwashed.  ‘Them’.

Suits.   Overhead.  Clueless. Management.  Style without substance.  ‘Them’.

Business is Business, but it can’t run efficiently without technology.  And technology without business purpose is simply playing.  Getting business people to work effectively with technology by understanding the art of the simple, the possible and the stuff of technical nightmares is not easy.  Guiding technologists to think about the application of the stuff that drives them – what it does for top or bottom line, how it differentiates, why it’s unique – is a question of getting people to appreciate different perspectives and is a critical part of stakeholder management for success in any endeavour.

I have met business people who proudly claim technical ignorance, and do not see this as a handicap but – in some cases – a badge of honour.  That’s not healthy.  I can somewhat see an argument for not limiting your horizons, but I don’t subscribe to it.

Some technologists are idealists, who think that just doing something because it’s cool means they’ll get paid without understanding the applicability or the context in which something cool might happen.  The meme “1. Do something inexplicable 2. ??? 3. Profit!” is supposed to be humour, not a mantra for life.

A successful organisation needs those driven by business, and those driven by technology: a balance of both is key, along with a mutual respect and understanding.  Ideally, it needs a function who can quickly rationalise both perspectives, and form the bridge between the vision and the execution.

It is extremely noteworthy that the astounding ideas for business that I’ve been involved with have not mostly originated from business people, but from technical people who have stepped out of their comfort zone.  Innovation drives ideas, and on balance my experience says more innovation comes out of the technical field than the business field – and that technical innovation leads to disruption, meaning you need to clearly need to bring business focused stakeholders on board.  The more disruptive, the wider the supporters’ expertise needs to be.

Business people complain that technologists rely on jargon, and do this without any hint of irony: the realisation that business is just as crammed full of jargon, and is just as unfamiliar or impenetrable to someone not in on the lingo, is sometimes not made.

Mix into this the fact that the lines of demarcation between sales, sales support and presales are incredibly fuzzy and it’s a recipe for a dynamic, changing and exciting place to be.  Some people will like this, others will feel incredibly uncomfortable an insecure.

An approach I’ve had success with in the past has been to forcibly mix the business and technology experts into an “expert team” around a particular challenge or business area with the objective to deliver differentiation and client value.  A little more direction is needed, and of course good governance and control, but the results can be highly interesting and unexpected.

Business needs techies.  The techies need the suits.  Don’t just deal with it, embrace it: vive la différance!

Enterprise Mobility: Making it real

Enterprise mobility will get rolled out proactively, reactively or simply by stealth but one thing is for sure: it is happening, and it will happen in every enterprise that is still around in 5 years time. It is a natural consequence of the consumerisation of IT, and it is up to an enterprise to choose how to roll with it.

I pick two inflection points that led to the IT department losing the ability to simply say no: first, wireless networking and secondly the iPhone. Both are disruptive, both make life for their users easier by changing their work habits to the point that changing back is not an option, and both bring their own challenges to IT particularly around security.  When someone with authority gets a taste of the benefits of such disruption, watch the fur fly…

So, mobility is coming just like wireless networks now permeate every corner of enterprises and BYOD is embraced.  The benefits brought by mobility depend on how much the technology is really adopted, but some examples:

  • Improved customer service, optimising every contact to provide the right information needed
  • Better supply chain logistics by elimination of waiting time in human-centric processes
  • More productivity through elimination of system dependence
  • Location/spatial aware innovation
  • Decision making anywhere
  • Better adoption of straight through processing approaches, driving efficiency, data quality and better decision making

There is a common theme to these benefits: the situation that employees -or clients – find themselves in is brought into sharp focus by the availability of an always on, always connected, rich device.  Because of the limited real estate on screen, the interaction must be optimised to put the right piece of information and the right options in a small area.  That implies an in-depth knowledge of the situation, and the task at hand.  Such focus is essential to succeed, and is an intrinsic part of mobility.

So what’s the way forward?

  • Identify a champion team: an exec sponsor who loves innovation, a technologist who loves delivering the Next Big Thing, a realist to keep things moving forward through the hype cycle…
  • Identify current inefficiencies that block or interfere with your most valuable team members doing their job: think situation-led, but don’t ignore process.
  • Run an innovation dragon’s den – perhaps shortlisting ideas, and having someone champion them.  Vote, agree the ideas to go forward, and start!
  • Set objectives for a proof of concept, including KPI metrics and success criteria.
  • Start small, but evangelise and keep an eye on the biggest picture

Of course, this doesn’t solve the problems associated with a heterogeneous device population or app distribution, but it’s a start.  More on addressing the issues in a future article.

But most importantly:

  • Forget fighting enterprise mobility: embrace it, and it’ll make a positive impact to growth and productivity.  Fight it, and you’re trying to stop the tide.
  • Think different: think always on, always connected, location aware, but most importantly situation and user centric!
  • Pragmatism rules!

Nurturing the Innovators

So, we can embrace the Millenials, or we can mold them into the existing way of doing business.  Given that creativity is now the biggest leadership quality that CEOs are looking for, I think the right approach to take is obvious.

Yet pragmatism is, of course, the way forward. Things won’t change overnight, but an organisation will only maximise benefit from the right time to market for their ideas…

My view is that leadership must be open to embrace new ideas and value creativity in reality, not just talk about it!  That means someone in the board/SMT/LT must make it their job to ensure such innovation is brought out and captured, but also handled effectively and progressed as far as it is logical to take it.  An important point is to ensure there’s no fear of failure here: many ideas will fall by the wayside, and the sooner something that will not work is stopped, the better.  Ideas are free, they can give you a lot, but they can cost you a lot, too.

Is it possible to measure creativity? Because if it’s not measured you won’t get it from a board member, however the measure must be right.  It’s not just about value: a more holistic approach is necessary. The key piece is to ensure that we not kill the whole thing we’re trying to achieve: more creativity!

And yes, a process is necessary – but that should be lightweight and able to flex.  Ideas need a team behind them, and that team must share the vision of the idea: that can only be initiated by the source of the idea, the creator.  There is no single way to push every inspiration to its natural conclusion, but control and measurement are pretty much a guaranteed way to ensure they die.  Spend 15 minutes watching that link, it’s worth it, but 3 things that’ll kill creativity are surveillance, overcontrol and competition.

That is rather at odds with corporate culture in many organisations.  Of course we cannot remove these things, but they can be approached using my favourite word: pragmatism.

I like using competition to kick start ideation, but to make the prize repeatable: if there’s things that are deserving of winning, allow them to win.  I ended up with 3 winners the last time I ran an innovation drive using competition.  And the idea that ended going furthest was from the shyest, and the least business aware person!

Another important point is to allow the source to take the role they wish in the development of their innovation/disruption.  Many techies will not want to think about the business applicability, but to get attention and funding there needs to be some relevance and resonance with business: the innovation lead must ensure the source is involved, driving as they want to drive, but is getting the support and mentoring they need to advance to the next stage.

I have run innovation processes, and have been astonished by some of the ideas that have come out.  The more disruptive, the less attention paid to the status quo, the better.  Some are truly revolutionary, and others are small evolutions, but all have been worthwhile of attention.

Creativity rules.  It will come for free from the new workforce, who don’t have the fear of failure.

Put the pieces in place to ensure the ideas that are born are given the change to live – and die.  And watch the difference to your business creativity, vision and value.

We’re the old guard now…

Many strategists and senior managers in the IT world are graduates of the 90s.  One thing I think everyone can agree on is that the pace of change in business and IT has only increased.  What does that mean for the direction we’re taking and advising?

Remember the passion with which we evangelised the difference the web would make?  Remember the blank looks from senior management?  Remember how TCP/IP was just one of myriad network stacks, and the pain with Windows 3.11?  Remember how Windows 95 proved we were right?

Maybe you remember Marble, the UK’s first Internet-only credit card, beating Egg by days (no pun intended)?  Or being asked to pay for internet banking?  Perhaps you remember the promises of SOA, or CORBA?  Or your first Google search, replacing forever AltaVista in your heart?

Remember the bemusement, or slightly indulgent tolerance, when you advocated to senior management that the world was changing significantly and never be the same again due to the web?

The people who were born when I was studying for A-Levels are now my colleagues.  Call them the Digital Natives, call them the Millennials, call them whatever: the nomenclature is immaterial.  They’re bringing their passion, their evangelism, for their way of doing things, which “isn’t how we do things”.

They’re bringing their own devices.  They’re bringing their peer groups that they listen to.  And they know who to ignore.  They’re using whatever services they want, wherever they run.  They’re expecting service provision in seconds, any where, any time, any device.  They’re disrupting business through IT in exactly the same ways we all were and causing headaches for: security, risk, process, governance, regulatory compliance and more.  And they will drive the future, whether we embrace it or not.

So…  What’s the right approach: bemusement, amused tolerance, or adoption?  The high level trends are well known, but what about the innovation coming from individuals?  How should we propose to mentor and encourage such things, and encourage people to continue to create and disrupt but in the right way?

My view later.